The recently constituted empowered group of ministers ("eGoM") has suggested to the Finance Ministry that the existing tax exemption available to a unit set up in a Software Technology Park ("STP") should be extended beyond 2009, when it is scheduled to expire, to bring it on par with the tax benefits available to a unit set up in a Special Economic Zone ("SEZ"). This suggestion was made to eGOM by the Prime Ministers Office ("PMO"), whose earlier suggestion of scraping the minimum land requirement for an Information Technology SEZ ("IT SEZ") has been accepted and is being implemented now.
Currently under section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("ITA"), an STP unit can avail of a 10 year tax holiday on export profits, while under section 10AA of the ITA, an SEZ unit (including an IT unit set up in SEZ) can avail of a 15 year tax holiday on export profits, which is 100 per cent for the first five years, 50 per cent for the next five years, and up to 50 per cent for further five years, subject to creation of a SEZ Re-investment Reserve account. Further, section 10AA states that STP units, which have availed of a complete tax exemption under section 10A, cannot avail of any SEZ tax benefits. It is pertinent to note that the exemption available to an SEZ unit is open-ended and has no sunset clause as in the case of an STP unit.
Apart from the direct tax benefits, both STP and SEZ units enjoy similar indirect tax benefits such as exemption from excise, Value Added Tax ("VAT") and local state level taxes. However, an STP unit provides more locational flexibility as opposed to an SEZ unit, which needs to be located in an identified area designated as SEZ. The call for the extension of the tax exemptions for an STP unit comes in the wake of the fear that STP units may migrate to an SEZ, post 2009, when the exemption available to STP units is scheduled to expire. However, there is ambiguity on whether STP units will be allowed to migrate to an SEZ, and the same has to be clarified foremost in order to assess the benefits of the current proposal.
It seems that the proposed extension of tax benefits would be available only to "new" STP units and thus such a move would provide IT companies an opportunity of two different avenues with similar tax benefits to set up IT units. Thus, the PMO's suggestion, if implemented by the Finance Ministry, would open up more opportunities for the IT companies to set up their operations.
However, certain ambiguities remain in this proposal. The status of granting the SEZ tax holiday to the existing STP units, which by 2009 would not have availed of the full 10 year tax exemption, is not clear. Also, their status vis-à-vis the proposed extension of SEZ tax benefits to STP units, which seem to be made available only to "new" units, remains uncertain.
It remains to be seen whether the Finance Ministry accepts the proposal of eGOM of extending such SEZ benefits to STP units.
The contents of this hotline should
not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.
This hotline does not constitute a
legal opinion and may contain information generated
using various artificial intelligence (AI) tools or
assistants, including but not limited to our in-house
tool,
NaiDA. We strive to ensure the highest quality and
accuracy of our content and services. Nishith Desai
Associates is committed to the responsible use of AI
tools, maintaining client confidentiality, and adhering
to strict data protection policies to safeguard your
information.
This hotline provides general information
existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is
intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates
neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any
loss arising to any person acting or refraining from
acting as a result of any material contained in this
Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice
be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances.
This hotline does not substitute the need to refer to
the original pronouncements.
This is not a spam email. You have
received this email because you have either requested
for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since
India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive,
which states that a email cannot be considered spam
if it contains the sender's contact information, which
this email does. In case this email doesn't concern
you, please
unsubscribe from mailing list.