Tax Hotline
May 16, 2008
Income on Participatory Notes under the lens of Indian tax authorities: The Vodafone saga continues……….
The Indian income tax authorities have once again hit the news by issuing notices to Foreign Institutional Investors (“FIIs”) claiming that the income on Participatory Notes (“P-Notes”) is taxable in India since the income arises due to the sale of the underlying Indian security which has its situs in India.
In the Indian context, P-Notes are offshore derivative instruments (“ODIs”) issued by FIIs to overseas investors who have no direct access to the Indian stock markets to facilitate trading in Indian securities. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) has restricted the issuance of P-Notes within certain limits to regulated entities, i.e. regulated by authorities such as a central bank, stock exchanges, securities regulator with effect from October 25, 2007.
Many of the FIIs which have made investments in India and have issued P-Notes are situated in Mauritius and hence gains arising to them on the transfer of the underlying Indian security is not subjected to tax in India, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India. The tax authorities have issued notices to the FIIs stating that they should withhold Indian tax while passing on the gains to P-Note holders, since the gains arise in India. The tax authorities seem to justify their demand on the basis that the income has a nexus with India under the Indian tax laws.
The genesis of imposing tax liability on the FIIs for issuance of P-Notes appears to stem from the recent Vodafone case filed by Vodafone B.V. (registered in Netherlands) against the tax authorities in India. In the said case the tax authorities have attempted to tax profits made outside India on the transfer / sale of shares of a foreign company by one non-resident to another on the basis that the underlying asset is the interest in the Indian Company. Accordingly, the tax authorities have issued a show cause notice to Vodafone, treating it as an ‘assessee in default’ for its failure to withhold tax on the payments made to the purchaser of the shares. Vodafone has challenged the right of the tax authorities to levy capital gains tax on the transfer of the shares of a foreign company outside India, for which consideration is paid outside India, by filing a writ petition, which is pending before the Bombay High Court.
ANALYSIS
The tax authorities seem to have applied the same logic as in the Vodafone case to justify imposition of tax on the income from P-Notes which represent the underlying interest in the Indian companies. The moot question is whether the income arising on the P-Notes can be said to have a nexus with India, which would probably also depend on the terms of issuance of the P-Notes. Strictly reading the Indian tax law, it is doubtful if the income on foreign P-Notes in all cases can be deemed to accrue or arise in India. The characterization of income may also have a bearing on the taxability of income from the P-Notes. Even if the situs is said to be in India, if the P-Note holder has invested through a country with which India has a tax treaty, the question is whether the terms of the applicable tax treaty would also point at the situs of the capital gains also being in India and hence subject the same to Indian taxation, which we believe is highly unlikely.
In any case, this controversy would leave the P-Note holder and the FII in a tricky situation since as per the provisions of the Indian tax laws, the FII would be required to deduct tax at source in case the income is said to be chargeable to tax in India.
CONCLUSION
The recent initiative of the tax authorities to tax the income arising from P-Notes will have far reaching implications on the investment inflows in India as a substantial percentage of investments made by the FII’s is in the form of P-Notes. On the issue of taxability of P-Notes, whether such demand stands the test and scrutiny of the courts in India, is definitely debatable.
- International Tax Team
Source: The Economic Times dated May 15, 2008
Disclaimer
The contents of this hotline should
not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.
This hotline does not constitute a
legal opinion and may contain information generated
using various artificial intelligence (AI) tools or
assistants, including but not limited to our in-house
tool,
NaiDA. We strive to ensure the highest quality and
accuracy of our content and services. Nishith Desai
Associates is committed to the responsible use of AI
tools, maintaining client confidentiality, and adhering
to strict data protection policies to safeguard your
information.
This hotline provides general information
existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is
intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates
neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any
loss arising to any person acting or refraining from
acting as a result of any material contained in this
Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice
be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances.
This hotline does not substitute the need to refer to
the original pronouncements.
This is not a spam email. You have
received this email because you have either requested
for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since
India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive,
which states that a email cannot be considered spam
if it contains the sender's contact information, which
this email does. In case this email doesn't concern
you, please
unsubscribe from mailing list.
|