Research at NDA
April 23, 2010
Cheer for Arbitration: Consultation Paper Released
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) was enacted to provide a pro arbitration regime with minimal judicial intervention. However, certain decisions of courts in India interpreted provisions of the Arbitration Act in a manner that led to an increase in judicial intervention and curtailment of party autonomy. These decisions, which have been discussed later, resulted in considerable public debate and were widely criticized by jurists and practitioners.
Litigation in India is known to be a much prolonged process and arbitration offers an efficacious alternative for resolving disputes expeditiously. Owing to the complexities of the existing arbitration regime in India, a need was felt to introduce amendments in the Arbitration Act to bring it in conformity with international best practices.
Based on the recommendations of the 176th Report of the Law Commission of India, The Arbitration Amendment and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2003 (“Bill”) was introduced in Parliament in December, 2003. In July, 2004 the Bill was referred for in-depth study to a committee chaired by Justice Dr. B.P. Saraf and later the Bill was referred for examination to the Departmental Relating Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice (“Standing Committee”). The Standing Committee was of the view that the provisions of the Bill still contained room for excessive intervention by Courts in arbitration proceedings. The Standing Committee further expressed the view that since many provisions of the Bill were contentious, the Bill may be withdrawn and a fresh legislation may be brought into effect after considering the recommendations of the Standing Committee. Accordingly, the bill was withdrawn from Parliament.
The Union Ministry of Law and Justice (“Ministry”) has now released a consultation paper proposing key amendments in the Arbitration Act. Though a much belated move, it is nevertheless a step in the right direction and provides hope that India would soon become an arbitration friendly jurisdiction. Please click here for our analysis of the consultation paper.
Please write to us should you have any comments or suggestions on the consultation paper. We will consider them while forwarding our recommendations to the Ministry.
- Gautam Dembla & Shafaq Uraizee-Sapre
Disclaimer
The contents of this hotline should
not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.
This hotline does not constitute a
legal opinion and may contain information generated
using various artificial intelligence (AI) tools or
assistants, including but not limited to our in-house
tool,
NaiDA. We strive to ensure the highest quality and
accuracy of our content and services. Nishith Desai
Associates is committed to the responsible use of AI
tools, maintaining client confidentiality, and adhering
to strict data protection policies to safeguard your
information.
This hotline provides general information
existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is
intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates
neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any
loss arising to any person acting or refraining from
acting as a result of any material contained in this
Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice
be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances.
This hotline does not substitute the need to refer to
the original pronouncements.
This is not a spam email. You have
received this email because you have either requested
for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since
India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive,
which states that a email cannot be considered spam
if it contains the sender's contact information, which
this email does. In case this email doesn't concern
you, please
unsubscribe from mailing list.
|